Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:19:18 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ld --export-all, --exclude-libs,ALL
Message-ID:	<20011210101918.E740@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20011122014016 DOT 60481 DOT qmail AT web14504 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20011122014016.60481.qmail@web14504.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:40:16PM +1100

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:40:16PM +1100, Danny Smith wrote:
> Thanks all for your comments.   
> I have moved the discussion to here:
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-11/msg00570.html
> 
> Danny

I found that the discussion of that feature on binutils wasn't
really active.  Only Ralf Habacker has given his opinion in
relation to libtool.  OTOH, this feature sounds rather interesting
(after I understood what it's doing).  Should we try to push the
discussion on binutils again?  Would there be a sense to move
forward and release a Cygwin version of binutils adding that
feature even if it's not in the base version?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -