Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:59:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: RFP: texmf
Message-ID:	<20011205005932.GA12063@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<m3zo50xawc DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <20011203212637 DOT GA29013 AT redhat DOT com> <m3vgfox8k8 DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <3C0D54FC DOT A6FDDA21 AT t-online DOT de> <m3vgfmzduo DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<m3vgfmzduo.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:53:51AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>520066587150-0001 AT t-online DOT de (Jerome BENOIT) writes:
>>I will try to rebuild the tetex-beta package this week-end.  To avoid
>>any confusion, I plan to rename it `tetex-bin' as suggested in a
>>previous email.
>
>Very nice.

Actually, I'm not so sure.  How is this going to avoid confusion?  The old
package will still be around and it will be named 'tetex-beta'.

>Maybe we should rename texmf-base to tetex-base?  Also, if you (or
>anyone else) would like to take over the texmf packages I did, please
>do so.  But suggestions are welcome too.

If someone will be around to either fix setup.exe to deal with this scenario
or fix the inevitable user questions then renaming sounds like it makes
sense.

cgf

- Raw text -