Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BCE65D3.1010808@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:17:07 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Autotools; new versions
References:	<3BAA33FD DOT 9C1B704C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010920143410 DOT B5666 AT redhat DOT com> <3BC94CE5 DOT 8070206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011015111857 DOT I1696 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BCB0C10 DOT 6060409 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011016104040 DOT T1696 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BCC438D DOT 1080002 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BCC448B DOT 4030802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BCD3C9E DOT 4060101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Charles Wilson wrote:

> Okay, next attempt is up at
>   http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/autotools/
> the updated setup.ini file indicates the packages you should use for the 
> "new" version.
> 
> Changes:
>   /usr/autotool/stable  &  /usr/autotool/devel
>   use stable version if VER <= 2.13, devel version else.
>    (Previously, used stable ver IFF VER == 2.13.  Doh!)
>   split up my build script into separate ones so that single
>     packages can be built/tar'red/etc, instead of all-at-once.
> 
> I haven't yet installed this or tested it, but I wanted to let you guys 
> know what was up before I went to bed. It's waaaaayyy late...


Okay, I've installed and tested these packages on my machine.  They seem 
to work okay on a small test project -- both stable version and devel 
version.  Also, all four packages perform as well as they each ever have 
on their own make check's:

   autoconf-2.13  : expected passes 226 unexpected failures 33 (*)
   autoconf-2.52  : All 155 tests successfull
   automake-1.4p5 : All 195 tests passed
   automake-1.5   : All 323 tests passed

(*) This is the same as always.

Note that I had the courtesan.com version of mktemp installed.

Comments, anyone?  Corinna, does this "release" address your concerns?

--Chuck

- Raw text -