www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>I'm not going to lie to you -- it IS extra work. However, I hope that >>the extra work is *minimal* -- and to convince you that it is necessary. >> >>The "stable" branch: >> autoconf-2.13 >> automake-1.4p5 >>I would assume that these will never need to be updated. All current >>development by the GNU guys is on the 2.52/1.5 branches. >> >>the "devel" branch: >> autoconf-2.52 >> automake-1.5 >>These are the versions you are already maintaining, and keeping current. >> No *additional* work involved here. >> > > Just building with another --prefix, right? Correct. (BTW, all four versions passed 'make check' with flying colors). My build script and a README are included in automake-1.5-2-src.tar.bz2. > > BTW, I would prefer a common path for both packages inside of > /usr to not mess up /usr unneccessarily: > > /usr/autotool/stable > /usr/autotool/devel > That's easy enough to fix. I'll try to get to fixing that, and the other bug I mentioned, tonight. Then I'll upload new packages to my website. >>and I'll be around. >> > > That's most important ;-) --Chuck
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |