www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/10/14/00:04:06

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <017601c15465$94e266a0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20011014025328 DOT 24230 DOT qmail AT web14505 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20011013232846 DOT A2364 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: GCC-3 additions
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:06:20 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2001 04:12:04.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[617AA6F0:01C15466]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: GCC-3 additions


> >2) How important is fastcall calling convention to cygwin apps.  I
have
> >been working with Eric Kohl on a patchset that he is keen to get into
mingw
> >binaries. ReactOS project needs them for building MS-compat device
drivers.
> > They involve changes in binutils (as, dlltool, ld) as well as gcc.
These
> >are still WIP
>
> I'd like to have fastcall conventions.  I think it is necessary if we
want
> gcc to be a replacement for MSVC.

Also a requirement to build many low level things with gcc - and if/when
we get more 'mounting' capability, a logical extension to that is the
ability to provide _real_ win32 mounting - and that will require
fastcall AFAIK.

> Out of curiousity, how does fastcall differ from attribute ((regparm
(n)))?

AFAIK it's simply the symbol convention in the object file that is the
issue.

Rob

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019