Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20011013222258.87917.qmail@web14503.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Oct 2001 08:22:58 +1000 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: processor compatibility when building packages
To:	cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

This topic came up about a year ago on this list: 
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-07/msg00039.html

and I've recently raised it again on mingw lists.

Looking at cygwin's spec file it says:


*cpp_cpu_default:
%(cpp_686)


To me that means that, unless user overrides with command line -march or
-mcpu option, code is tuned for i686.  To get that into the specs file, one
has to either configure gcc so that TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT=3 (=pentium) or pass
that define to make when building gcc.

That interpretion is different from the conclusion that was posted in the
message pointed to above, which says that cygwin-produced code will run on
any i[35467]86 arch.  

I'm not talking about the platform triplet moniker -- that I realise is
just a name.  I'm asking: Has anyone complained that cygwin-built apps fail
on i386 but not on i686? 

Danny


http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase
- Manage your files online.

- Raw text -