Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2001 22:05:57 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz
Subject:	Re: Fwd: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function attributes
Message-ID:	<20010921220557.A30584@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz
References:	<20010921024950 DOT 63785 DOT qmail AT web14509 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20010921024950.63785.qmail@web14509.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:49:50PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
>Joseph's patch is here:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-09/msg00774.html
>
>I will start on this. Any interest in backport to 3.0.1, or should I
>just target 3.1?  I'm hoping it may solve some of the other attribute
>problems (stdcall and dllimport) in C++ classes with 3.0.1. 

Can you build the trunk version of gcc, Danny?

I can't.  I get this:

./xgcc -B./ -B/cygnus/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -isystem /cygnus/i686-pc-cygwin/include -S tmp-dum.c
cc1: Tree check: expected class 't', have 'x' (error_mark) in i386_pe_encode_section_info, at config/i386/winnt.c:386
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.

This error seems to be directly related to the above patch.

Joseph said that he'd built gcc as i386-cygwin32 (sic), so I wonder why
this isn't "working for me".

cgf

- Raw text -