Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2001 18:20:52 -0400
Message-Id:	<200108022220.SAA14393@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning:	envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu
CC:	binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3B69D143.5020100@ece.gatech.edu> (message from Charles Wilson on
	Thu, 02 Aug 2001 18:16:35 -0400)
Subject:	Re: [RFA] pei386 dll: auto-import patch
References:	<3B670087 DOT 7090102 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108011735 DOT NAA32231 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B6846D2 DOT 9040206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108011847 DOT OAA32757 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68C879 DOT 1070809 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020347 DOT XAA05289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68ED4B DOT 4080405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020610 DOT CAA06564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B68F80C DOT 7030207 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108020700 DOT DAA06930 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B699A88 DOT 7060904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200108021836 DOT OAA12734 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3B69D143 DOT 5020100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

> However, test results on cygwin are NOT the same as on linux (more 
> failures on cygwin).  See attached test result summaries.  I don't think 
> this discrepancy should hold up inclusion of this patch -- this patch 
> doesn't WORSEN current behavior.  The test results just indicate that 

Expected.  The test was to make sure you didn't cause new problems, on
the intended target as well as an unrelated target.

> I don't have commit priveleges; somebody else is going to have to check 
> this in.

Um, yes you do, unless there's another Charles Wilson checking things
into sources?  If you can check into cygwin, you can check into
binutils as well (with permission, of course).  They're in the same
repository.

- Raw text -