Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A1D4454.C9EE8EE5@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:22:44 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: FAQ entry? (Was: Texinfo-4.0)
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0011221237210 DOT 10055-100000 AT c445745-a DOT stcla1 DOT sfba DOT home DOT com>
	<3A1C3784 DOT 9DEF7B94 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
	<20001122163225 DOT B11387 AT redhat DOT com>
	<585-Wed22Nov2000234324+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
	<3A1C79BB DOT 6F1DEA77 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1053-Thu23Nov2000130050+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>

David Starks-Browning wrote:
> Chuck,
> 
> Thanks.  I haven't scrutinized it, but my first impression is that
> this is too much for a FAQ entry.  It seems to me that a separate web
> page, just for package maintainers, would be more appropriate for
> this.  (I don't mean private to package maintainers, just topical.)
>
[ snip ]
> 
> If nothing else, the current FAQ could provide URL's to messages like
> Chuck's.

Sounds reasonable to me.

--Chuck

- Raw text -