Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:56:55 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch?
Message-ID:	<20001120165655.A10710@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20001120164800 DOT C9396 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 20 DOT 0011201649120 DOT 24792-100000 AT frontal DOT ibb DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.20.0011201649120.24792-100000@frontal.ibb.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:53:07PM -0500

On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:53:07PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Grr.  Email crossing.  I thought he said that you had a version with a nice
>> cyglibbz.dll (or whatever).
>
>Well, yeah -- but I sent it to him.  Basically, we've been passing
>patches back and forth, and I think we are currently
>synchronized.  The questions is, once it's uploaded which one of us
>maintains it?  I can upload it tonight as a test release, if there are no
>objections.

None from me.  I don't care if you both want to maintain it.  :-)

Are there info files in bzip2?

Didn't Michael indicate that he had a version of patch which correctly dealt
with CRLF issues, too?

cgf

- Raw text -