Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<39A2CE6C.7D32C24B@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:03:08 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Michael Ring <michael-ring AT t-online DOT de>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl-5.6.0 ready for test! (IMPORTANT READ THIS MESSAGE ON
	MAINTAINER STATUS!)
References:	<20000822120810 DOT 11721 DOT qmail AT web106 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000822124410 DOT D28312 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A2C2E2 DOT CBDB94D1 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20000822143226 DOT A29889 AT cygnus DOT com> <k3i5qso5fv4oquq7t3t0ghoelcn3do8mbd AT 4ax DOT com>

Michael Ring wrote:

> >>Good idea? Bad idea? Tremendously stupid idea? Nice idea but would never
> >>work in reality?
> 
> Don't like that. I think there are enough lists already. I would only
> like to see cygwin-apps as an open group like cygwin. (No allowance to
> post needed)
> 
> >
> >I dunno.  I think it would probably be best to just use the existing mailing
> >lists for this.  If we start making a mailing list for every cygwin package
> >it will get pretty unmanageable.  I'll be spending 90% of my time saying
> >"This is off-topic for this mailing list".  :-)

A very good point, Chris.

Okay, I bow to the wisdom of the majority and withdraw my suggestion.

--Chuck

- Raw text -