Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
list-help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
list-post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:33:30 -0400
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Cc:	rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com, cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu
Subject:	Re: I *do* want to fix gcc/binutils
Message-ID:	<20000614003330.A17622@cygnus.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com,
	cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu
References:	<20000613200658 DOT A19673 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000613215310 DOT A17725 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<20000613215310.A17725@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 09:53:10PM -0400

On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 09:53:10PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 08:06:58PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>>I'm downloading the gcc/binutils sources right now (for some reason it
>>is taking forever).  I was planning on applying Ron and Chuck's patches
>>and trying to track down the _impure_ptr problem.  I refreshed my memory
>>on the problem with some email from Mumit.
>>
>>Ron, you were possibly going to upload a new version of gcc tonight,
>>right?  It doesn't fix the -mno-cygwin problem does it?  Is anyone else
>>investigating this?
>
>I think I've tracked down the problem and it seems to have a simple fix.
>I'd be happy to provide the patch to anyone who has this stuff ready
>to go.
>
>In the meantime, I'll start a build going and go play Word Racer on
>games.yahoo.com ...

The build didn't succeed.  It stalled on building libobjc.  It
progressed far enough for me to test the version of gcc that I built.
That didn't work either.  It complained about various undefined symbols
in tinfo.c.

Maybe this is a result of plugging in a recent libiberty.

Oh, and, of course, I'm cross building this on linux like I do all
of my other net packages.  I guess tomorrow I can try three-staging
this to see if that works better.  It might be a good idea to the
same version of gcc that we release to build our packages anyway.

cgf

- Raw text -