Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
list-help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
list-post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Sender:	cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu
Message-ID:	<393811D8.683758ED@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Fri, 02 Jun 2000 15:58:16 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
CC:	Michael Ring <m DOT ring AT ndh DOT net>, cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com,
	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RFD: Include an easy editor in the cygwin-standard-distribution
References:	<200006021811 DOT OAA23810 AT mail DOT ee DOT gatech DOT edu>

"Parker, Ron" wrote:
> 
> > I was planning to include 'vim' in the group of packages I'm
> > recompiling
> > for 'official distribution' in latest/extras/ (or latest/../extras/ or
> > wherever). However, my version of vim is not totally independent; you
> > still need ncurses and terminfo, which is huge.
> 
> Not to take anything away from your version.  I am not familiar with it.
> (So much software...so little time.)  The standard VIM 5.6 built on my
> machine this morning without ncurses or terminfo.  Looking at config.cache
> it was happy with termios.h and termcap.
> 
> > A quick build of nano on my system links to curses, but I think if
> > curses is not present then nano will use termcap. If not, then at
> > minimum a 'nano' or 'tiny-vim' distribution can be built statically
> > linked to ncurses, and include only /usr/share/terminfo/l/linux,
> > .../c/cygwin, and .../r/rxvt.
> 
> Nano will not build w/o curses.  It was my first thought for an
> Idiot's-Guide-to-Small-Editors candidate.  However ncurses and slang take it
> right out of the small category.

Slang *is* optional -- but I wasn't sure about ncurses. If nano won't
build with termcap, then I guess it's out of the question. Building nano
with static-ncurses is only 200k according to Michael, but it's not the
ncurses LIBRARY that I'm concerned about -- it's the massive termlib
database.

Sounds like we still have two candidates -- vim+termcap, or [a]ee. I
haven't yet read the rest of this thread, though...

--Chuck

- Raw text -