From:	eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: missing cc1plus.exe file
Date:	20 Sep 2000 12:18:00 GMT
Organization:	Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<8qa9to$hf8$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<_spx5.40284$XZ4 DOT 513027 AT news DOT infostrada DOT it> <6ntfssgr3sfbc8bb8e473oothqqku47uln AT 4ax DOT com> <8q8vpi$c9e$1 AT murdoch DOT acc DOT Virginia DOT EDU> <8q9vhv$dlq$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <8qa77h$q71$1 AT murdoch DOT acc DOT Virginia DOT EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	lws256.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Clark L. Coleman (clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU) wrote:
: It turns out that cc1 is getting "divide overflow" errors and
: terminating. The FOO.O file is an old one, not being recreated each
: time. So, this is another "too big for gcc to handle" problem, I
: think, as the file being compiled has really big basic blocks, big
: switch statements,long distance branches, etc. Compiles fine in
: Solaris, IRIX, etc. environments with gcc 2.8.1 and 2.95.x, but not
: with latest 2.95.2 in DJGPP. What next?

Any error messages? Stack dumps? (Complete, to be useful.)

Perhaps cc1 needs a bigger stack. Try reading FAQ 15.9. How much
memory do you have (go32-v2)?

Try out some older versions of gcc and see if they have the same
problem.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -