Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E19BA39.65EB1511@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jan 2003 17:17:45 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: diff format (was: Re: your mail)
References:	<200301061401 DOT h06E1E118542 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> 
> According to Richard Dawe:
> > ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
[snip]
> > > Here. We prefer patches made with "diff -pruN" or "diff -prN", if I'm
> > > not mistaken.
> >
> > I seem to remember Eli expressing a preference for context diffs (-prcN) a
> > while back. But no-one seemed to object, when I mistakenly posted unified
> > diffs. ;)
> 
> Sorry, I thought diff defaulted to context diffs.

Yes, you are right.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -