X-Authentication-Warning:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date:	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:56:54 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender:	broeker AT acp3bf
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: mkdoc patch
In-Reply-To:	<200007071341.JAA10990@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10007071551580.28224-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
> > If we are in the adding mode, why not add C89 and C99 too?
> 
> Or have something like:
> 
> ANSI: K&R, C89

'K&R' feels like the wrong term to mention as a flavour of ANSI. K&R
either means the first edition of their book, K&R1, which is usually the
exact opposite of ANSI, or K&R2, which is equivalent to ANSI C89.

Something like

	ANSI: yes 

if it's ANSI ever since C89, or 

	ANSI: yes, since C99

if it's something new, only introduced with C99, feels better.

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -