Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:02:11 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Wish for gcc .95x (stabs)
In-Reply-To:	<199909091851.UAA05636@robby.dittmannsdorf.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990913130139.8923C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> I have a wish for the coming gcc 2.95x. Would it be possible
> to make the stabs debugging format the default debugging format?

IMHO, we need at least to rewrite SYMIFY to support stabs, before we
can do that.

> I don't know if there are many users who play with fsdb and edebug32,
> but I think most people will use gdb or derived debuggers and for those
> is stabs debugging much more usefull. 

A simple change to specs is all that is needed, if you want this as your
private default.

- Raw text -