Message-Id:	<199907220030.AAA09334@out5.ibm.net>
From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To:	binutils AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 1999 20:30:51 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: DJGPP and alignment
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<19990721114723.A19378@cygnus.com>
References:	<199907211607 DOT QAA38452 AT out1 DOT ibm DOT net>; from Mark E. on Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 12:07:18PM -0400
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hello Richard,

> I fear you're getting yourself into trouble, since there's no
> way to change the section alignment in coff. 

Since the documentation is silent on this, what does 
COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER do then? My tests 
show it does increase the size of the object files and executables 
accordingly.

> If you do any sort of collect-sections-to-make-data kinds of
> things like .ctors or .dtors, that'll break.  Do you know that
> you're using collect2 to construct constructor lists?

I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think so. The linker script groups them 
together in the .data section and surrounds them with special symbols 
(djgpp_first_ctor, etc.) defined in the script.

Mark

--- 
Mark Elbrecht, snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/

- Raw text -