X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID: <19980701215923.37550@cerebro.laendle>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 21:59:23 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject: Re: bzip2-mx vs. bzip2-nomx
Mail-Followup-To: beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References: <98070101044400 DOT 00560 AT FoxServer DOT fox DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <98070101044400.00560@FoxServer.fox.net>; from Fox on Wed, Jul 01, 1998 at 12:59:27AM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.107 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.43 19980628 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental)) 
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1050
Lines: 21

On Wed, Jul 01, 1998 at 12:59:27AM +0200, Fox wrote:
> > K6-3D and K6-2 are much stronger in this area. They have a dual MMX core
> > and will perform better on MMX.
> 
> >is anybody with such beasts here that can test them against the two bzips?
> 
> Hello
> I have just subscribed to this mailing list so I don't exactly know what
> the discussion is about but I am wondering if there is a pgcc option in

you do not want to do this, it will be slower. there is a patch at
ftp.goof.com:/pub/pcg/test, against egcs, but it will not make your code
faster at the moment, and I dare real speed improvements are possible.

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |