X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 14:41:29 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsymcheck 'make check' failure final analysis In-Reply-To: <796bed87-7c91-fe93-fbfa-7090c731be36@epilitimus.com> Message-ID: References: <09a3adc8-401f-70fd-1ba4-c5cc850f62aa AT fastmail DOT com> <5a52e3b4-50a6-2b0e-7d7d-7eb144c5619f AT epilitimus DOT com> <1d8bac3a-9787-dd41-9269-ab8d3d681754 AT epilitimus DOT com> <54c87596-c5ef-cfba-d74d-2fa6411b555f AT fastmail DOT com> <796bed87-7c91-fe93-fbfa-7090c731be36 AT epilitimus DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > My final analysis on this error progression: AFAICT, this analysis is correct. > Ideally there should be a way to prevent non-source tree config files > from being loaded during a test run as there is no way to know what is > in them which may cause the test to fail. I agree. It's pretty low on my priority list, though, since it would become obsolete once the new configuration mechanism is in place. Roland