X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20201219205836.23919.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:58:36 +0000
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1.
References: <f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus>
 <20201219180603 DOT 22277 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
 <a3f3b383-ebf2-fc8a-6405-e1d69c2a6838 AT epilitimus DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a3f3b383-ebf2-fc8a-6405-e1d69c2a6838@epilitimus.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> And I would suggest a configure switch to allow use with guile-2.0 as
> well. The changes for 2.2 are minimal at this point. In time as the 2.2
> dependency becomes more extensive and 2.0 usage declines the support can
> be dropped. I am willing to write the patch if needed.

Maybe the code could be made to support both, with or without the
help of configure.

What would the patch for 2.0 need to change?


Kind regards

//Peter