X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=YI9adTKx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=5fd2a8da a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=ZeCmWsppjWE9NYE+QP5vCg==:17 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zTNgK-yGK50A:10 a=OftNyDUgYvgAzRF5QyIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] SAB processing patches To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20201130220505 DOT 0AE4282C54FD AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <7c75ed03-456c-b408-8b50-0448f6b3a04f AT epilitimus DOT com> <1b2c64b3-6a36-c1f3-dd54-bb583c6bea17 AT epilitimus DOT com> <475f980e-fddd-60d1-9a02-a5bc5fb5805b AT epilitimus DOT com> <25887669-D8C1-48B8-BEE7-13EEBFC4D006 AT noqsi DOT com> <7f074abb-e7ae-275c-ee49-d06fc7f2a706 AT epilitimus DOT com> <836e84ad-aa1d-fa56-5996-7445d92e94db AT epilitimus DOT com> <1BBAE111-8895-4DD9-A10C-EB35019A6D93 AT noqsi DOT com> From: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:01:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1BBAE111-8895-4DD9-A10C-EB35019A6D93@noqsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfAqZoO0BY0HvKEpRwS+xZaGGZZu6UPD7fGFMLxOAQPunVay15O3doPpx9bp0W0JQ4O1iA//WVc4Kcodpe780nnHFuaio0KGzdT0qkbiEeF3tLjVpzLxB b7sICxXSAZCd33/MoO3Maeh7wp+cw1626s9pvjA74HQW6PIR42ELBCd60F+yAip4PSAVD+p++4X6ad/KZbmZnvOKq8ISF1qOPS1jC6wIKXG14v3sZVjfryuJ Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty wrote: > Or you can make them once in a backend independent manner. > > Sounds like some of the early gEDA mistakes, like the overloading of > pinseq. How is anything but a SPICE flow going to make sense of a > spice-prototype? > SAB doesn't use spice-protoype but certainly a user could write a script to make use of it in a non-spice context if they wished to do so, and then access that script by means of an 'exec' action. Glenn