X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20200529163157.3024.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 16:31:57 +0000 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "dmn \(graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com\) \[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com\]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] [Announcement] Lepton EDA for Fedora Linux References: <20200529134555 DOT 4c042cc0 AT demon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200529134555.4c042cc0@demon> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk dmn (graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > it's quite surprising to see how complicated the process of becoming a > Fedora package maintainer is. Remember that Fedora Linux is nothing other than the RHEL development, testing and QA tree. Red Hat (corporation) is legally required to care first and foremost about Red Hat, and all practical matters follow directly from that. So it's logical that it's not so easy to make changes in their tree. > If anybody could suggest a better way than described in [1] to add > a new RPM to Fedora distro, it would be great. You can build and host rpm(s) for Fedora where you like, and people who use Fedora (ie. contribute free QA+testing to RHEL) can download and install .rpm files "by hand". Maybe there is even a way to add further third party package sources, which are then considered (searchable, installable, etc) by the package manager tools? That I don't know. //Peter