X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 19:57:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To: "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: [geda-user] Symbol warnings (was: Message about more than one component found)
In-Reply-To: <34b46f80-ba9e-b497-4552-a90e86112637@fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2001312152120.15354@nimbus>
References: <8b7939a5-0a6d-db94-ce88-da6df33ef616 AT fastmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 2001231400120 DOT 2060 AT nimbus> <34b46f80-ba9e-b497-4552-a90e86112637 AT fastmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 23 Jan 2020, Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Now, thanks to your explanation, I know how this message is generated 
> and I will make note of it for the future. [...] Maybe clearing up the 
> message is in order if there is opposition to making it an error.

I agree that this message as well as the symversion change message aren't 
too helpful in their current form, so I have implemented a new way how 
these messages are reported in the master branch.

Please let me know what you think about it.