X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1yU5Yl6+aRX4CmPfnHuJ90V/eSfFkKEBgqpb6+BxP HE=; b=h+KCEEW9vxY8XKdtNWUdrdozGZZGPmIs2VNkVFUIKW0wTNw9g3znR+JeL uza2JguEuVkbNhKLvFi5jflMXNVhA/DWyBI8xV653kmXaC/AoJEyhEeKxDaQQelc lDFcgl3FqU12qNinHTYvOCQ1xHdlJNI08lOKjtE/p4aeo9fhxMellD5C3Z7PVZBp SrYAsVyEADeW/2rvqC0gVFiemMVaBbu363JLmCxl41tSAvLpx1YYHU4BnsOgZxD/ 7XIpTOBuUP6nRDw9rcR5jLg50X6XtH1lLqgX7FPmsNsxbPPoif2VkOaVqLHBQGFH +FhEEYW3fzddbTRUOKVYQeC5cOqwQ== X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1yU5Yl6+aRX4CmPfn HuJ90V/eSfFkKEBgqpb6+BxPHE=; b=jrCGWvUC4L4Gh+8WJhvFl91l/QueDuG3F ihjJKEiY8wvwLueejc45qR4moAsb3A+2DniI8SYhPSyrYSNljF5smqJT2HI5sjLo sfnETt5gtLnk36PKyK3VoC+auchSFnxNPlpoKwJ6QCMoQxT04QgsBfsy4izaZsUd VDdHrhL9P4ap+Aa9pPXs/UzURqhUzAPvCKqb+tAAZl/7ujmj2zOWjQ1EQVTS2kMW MtvKRcAflvzvDQvTMTv1snWrxogh+H5kQgz311Jgj+XAlknMeSuEMQsggJDekDLr vWigtnvKp+g/hxwm2PLwj6/cL9I3WVcN320nvrU3+caYpsaueVm9Q== X-ME-Sender: To: gEDA User Mailing List From: "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: [geda-user] 2-level wire-wrap wire-list generator backend for gnetlist. Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:30:48 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Greetings, Yes, I know this is old technology, but I have a project which I intend to use wire-wrap technology to make a test breadboard. I tried the existing gnetlist backends to see if one is already there, but there is not. All of them produce a variation of: netname node1 node2 node3 node4... What I am looking for is: netname node1 node2, node3 node4, node2 node3... This is a wire chain where node1 to node2 and node3 to node4 are on the first (lower) level, and node2 to node3 is on the second (upper) level. Does anyone have such a backend or can point me to one? Thanks. Girvin Herr