X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:34:33 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] parametric footprint: screws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Attached is a libreoffice/openoffice file with the screw, washer and > hole sizes. It took a while because I never had a complete set made > for all of them. Some sizes are not available I think because they are > imperial specific. In the process of building the list I found some > errors in the stuff I had already made. Apparently they were good > enough to fit most stuff but I like having things perfect if I am > going to distribute them. > > I will provide example footprints in the morning. > Great, thanks! I'll write a generic screw() generator, that takes numeric arguments, once I see how you did it with static footprints. We could have metric/imperial specialized wrappers around that. Best would be to set up formulas: I'm still not sure storing big tables in footprint generators is better than having a table of static footprints. I think we have a chance to be able to fit formulas with some rounding. Could you please link a html or plain text export next time? Regards, Igor2