X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 03:55:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhSNRHrimsD7_dwg2kPxP=kMjt7xWNCd76TVBGqjPGOuSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1508240350330.6924@igor2priv>
References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
 <CAM2RGhSC6UfCr8ixF5iuffmUhcdgVuz9nA+YjiZNk8-f7Q5r-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231935040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAM2RGhSNRHrimsD7_dwg2kPxP=kMjt7xWNCd76TVBGqjPGOuSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

<snip>

> As I said it is about not diluting programming effort across
> forks/branches/what ever of PCB. I get that you want your own fork and
> that is cool. You made it off of the PCB source. Why do you object to
> people bringing your additions back to PCB? I kind of feel like this
> has gotten compeditive (pcb vs pcb-rnd) and I can not see why.

I don't object to people merge my stuff to mainline (or anywhere else). I 
only said I wouldn't do the merge myself and I wouldn't push it either, 
for I don't use mainline PCB.

I even stated that mainline developers could regard pcb-rnd as a testlab 
of features and benefit from it.

Regards,

Igor2