X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:39:57 -0400
Message-Id: <201508232339.t7NNdvDg012290@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <DA3A081C-C207-43E3-A70F-3DD12E68B440@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:54:08 -0400)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork
References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150822230549 DOT 3750 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <55D9A5AE DOT 9090604 AT jump-ing DOT de> <C2FC0AF3-DFDB-4799-87F7-039614405DCD AT noqsi DOT com> <201508231649 DOT t7NGnoM0029940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <DA3A081C-C207-43E3-A70F-3DD12E68B440 AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> On Aug 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >>> Ask Eagle or KiCAD users; they consider gEDA to be mostly dead,
> >>> because there's no visible development and newer developments also
> >>> don't get into Linux distributions.
> >> 
> >> Why should we listen to people who don't understand how a toolkit works?
> > 
> > Because they're right.
> 
> Baloney. They’re like people who expect Ornette Coleman to sound
> like Mozart. Nothing wrong with either, but they do not sound the
> same. If you think Eagle or KiCAD users are right, why don’t you
> join them?

I had no intention of starting your favorite flamewar.  Please re-read
the thread and consider all the other ways you could have interpreted
my comment, and try again.