X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-SourceIP: 95.97.163.245
X-Authenticated-Sender: b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Message-ID: <55DA2B4B.1010104@iae.nl>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:21:31 +0200
From: myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork
References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl> <201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201508231651.t7NGpEVt030026@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

>>> There's probably nothing wrong with that, but if that's the case, I
>>> find it natural that developers find it more motivating to develope
>>> for themselves than for the "crowd" - at least, that's the effect on me.
>> And this will be the dead of pcb.
> All the pcb developers have made it clear that they work on pcb for
> selfish reasons, this is nothing new.  I wish more users were
> motivated to work on it for selfish reasons.

Absolutely! But if "working for me" automatically means "not working 
together" I think any project will die.