X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh= JLCECvrjsrXr5ZqBoDyg/2tiY/kfBS0LYKrgS4ja74s=; b=H/dRM4rINMTEXiV/ cu8QTsVOwd8tUjRF96A0wetD6LdpjItdrP6I63+HGbORPM9sGtWquZeUwepsKYVy IST3eu1DOhK9t97UJtziKNrmwzdpdCScse39hKhtZGjysa0nSo6jcvuQ8ZNggXWL eKw+KvWBpI8amD/0VHpO6+0dEhA= Message-ID: <55D9FCB8.9040603@jump-ing.de> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:02:48 +0200 From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150822230549 DOT 3750 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <55D9A5AE DOT 9090604 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150823134609 DOT 2918 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <55D9D8C2 DOT 8070200 AT jump-ing DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Am 23.08.2015 um 17:12 schrieb gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu: > you could consider [...] > > I also suggest [...] > > I recommend [...] Honestly, I don't care much about such an attitude. The more you talk here the less I feel encouraged to take the extra steps to deal with your fork. At some point it becomes less work to implement the stuff myself. Markus -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/