X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:05:20 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork In-Reply-To: <55D9EB62.7020802@ecosensory.com> Message-ID: References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55D9EB62 DOT 7020802 AT ecosensory DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, John Griessen wrote: > On 08/22/2015 11:46 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:> The strange phenomenon is > that many people are willing to express their strong opinion on what features > are needed in pcb-rnd (or >> in pcb, on this regard we may consider pcb-rnd as a test lab from pcb's > perspective), but when it comes to actually compiling and >> running a new version, only a very few invest the time. > > I resemble that remark. This last week I could not divert to do compile and > try out even though I was a voter > in igor2's poll. > No problem. I think I used the wrong wording. I didn't mean to blame anyone or even imply that if someone voted in the poll he has to try my stuff. I only tried to share my observation about the general lack of user activity that I think affects all forks (including the mainline). I also tried to propose my idea of a no-compile package (an idea that may benefit mainline pcb as well). Too bad the whole thread got derailed. Regards, Igor2