X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:00:52 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150823051355 DOT 30150 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > This made me think to try the "unpack this tarball as an user and run > ./start". It's not the proper solution, just a hack. As an user, I wouldn't do > this, I'd go for a standard installation too. But it seems this is the "run a > program" equivalent of the video/web approach. Made this little graph about the situation: http://igor2.repo.hu/tmp/user_act.png The plot is not accurate, it's rather to show the proportions. I have absolutely no data about how many users use PCB from OS packages or how many users are actually reading the mailing list, so I've just put them on the left in parenthesis. The rest of the labels are approximetly: - the actual number of unique visitors according to my server logs on the footprint generator CGI - the actual number of donwnloads on the parametric footprint and scripting videos - about the number of valid poll votes collected from the mailing list - the number of users who reportedly downloaded and compiled pcb-rnd. The 1/x function is just a guess I pulled out of thin air. I think a static compiled "unpack and run" package could be somewhere between effort 0.3 and 0.4 on that graph, but we'll see (if I manage to compile it). Regards, Igor2