X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20150823051355.30150.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:13:55 +0200 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Evan Foss \(evanfoss AT gmail DOT com\) \[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com\]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork Mail-Followup-To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > honestly, did you try to install a different version of glib in > your home using autotools and then compile pcb using that version? Yes. And not just with the native toolchain, but cross toolchains too. A large number of package management systems support autotools. It's a very round wheel. > And did it work for the first attempt, without questions raised? Yes, every time, except for Windows, because of the guile problem. > I will try to compile an as-static-as-possible executable for x86_64 > Linux. It's not a priority so if it doesn't lead anywhere after a > day I will probably give up. But if it works, there'll be a way for > new users to try the stuff without having to check out and compile > anything (and honestly this seems to be one of the big bottlenecks > nowdays - even on Linux). Source-based distributions have handled this well for a long time, but binary distributions are intended primarily for consumption. With a grown-up source-based package manager it's not a problem. //Peter