X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20150822230549.3750.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 01:05:49 +0200
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork
Mail-Followup-To: gEDA User <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55D8D8B8.7050907@jump-ing.de>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> many talented people happily hack away on the project
...
> none of them does so in the official repo

Would it help if I host git repos and hand out commit access to
interested people?


>   ./antifork.sh
> 
> What do you think?

I think the branch ignore function should use a combination of
one remote URL (NB! git: vs. http: vs. https:) and one branch
name, rather than a commit hash, because the commit could be in
many branches and only one of them should be ignored.


//Peter