X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:04:50 -0400 Message-Id: <201508181604.t7IG4oOt005309@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB footprints - what is the best way to change origin location on existing footprint? References: <201508160552 DOT t7G5qBPo025284 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201508170550 DOT t7H5oW1T021206 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201508171557 DOT t7HFvFka015445 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201508172206 DOT t7HM6ZUI032712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com > Based on your latest comments about using absolute coordinates in > the past - could what I have been seeing with the footprint origin - > is this a legacy 'feature' that has been made non-functional with > new PCB releases? Could be. > > When you paste a footprint onto a pcb it becomes an element. At that > > point, the 0,0 of the footprint is mapped to wherever the crosshair > > is, and becomes the "location" of the element. > > > That has not been seen by my experiments. The value for the > footprint origin does not appear to matter. You're still confusing the element's location (the values in the Element[] line) with the footprint's origin, which is the (0,0) that all the other values are relative to. They are not the same.