X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:51:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Matt Rhys-Roberts (matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] my confusion re differing pad numbers and names
 (pcb)
In-Reply-To: <55D2F512.6050005@envinsci.co.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1508181250380.6924@igor2priv>
References: <55D2F512 DOT 6050005 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Matt Rhys-Roberts (matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:


<snip>

> Should I edit the footprint file to make the initial ("wrong") pad numbers 
> match the desired pad numbering? Am I worrying too much?!

I always do this. It's possible to remap things later on, but if you have 
such remappings in the flow the chance to make mistakes is higher.