X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1439890575.2874.34.camel@linetec> Subject: Re: [geda-user] my confusion re differing pad numbers and names (pcb) From: "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:36:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55D2F512.6050005@envinsci.co.uk> References: <55D2F512 DOT 6050005 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> Organization: Linetec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Matt Rhys-Roberts (matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] schreef op di 18-08-2015 om 10:04 [+0100]: > I've created a symbol with 13 pads in pcb, and it seems to convert to an > element quite well. > > After converting it to an element, I notice (by pressing D while > hovering over them) that the 13 pads are numbered arbitrarily, probably > in order of creation. > > I can assign each pad with the preferred names/numbers to match the pad > naming convention for my design, but I don't know if this is going to > confuse matters later? Hopefully gsch2pcb will sort things out? > > Should I edit the footprint file to make the initial ("wrong") pad > numbers match the desired pad numbering? Am I worrying too much?! The pads are indeed numbered in order of creation. In my experience, you can simply renumber the pads in the footprint file. Just make a note of how the numbers should change from what you see in PCB beforehand. The best approach is to number pads during creation. Each line that is to become a pad can be assigned a number by pressing N while hovering over it; just enter a number as the Line Name. When dealing with structural metal parts such as mounting tabs and pins on connectors, I usually assign these the number 0 (zero) -- although the gschem symbol should have a corresponding pin if these parts are to be connected to a circuit net (usually GND). Perhaps other people use a different approach here? Best regards, Richard Rasker