X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QjuqX8dGtPzoWiwOWrqMW1GrstLNxn7nqiq/VkKyBjk=; b=adkYXr8DDImS91xVPjjmjtfgZqW3rzHp3CusHS0b+SVoaWXz/FErzRjMMrIsFdK+eM 9YQBin/mFsSuiow/M7CphVfI9dutAClRUV2BfeE8r8u0upV3Uhp/Nf463ap8E29wVOd3 h4bSO+0IpKNwG/fLuFfzpxZwm0gigh9+qsOB1gCvWYyDJJaMuSgjQHahUOhH8S1iXEuM zr3Tb3QXsjrl3WPrSUvWyd203lAjjsPPmXX0CazqpAC8If3X8uGzUca9gL2NipvQoC4X U5dB1+jGyNyzVpZ2DFjKw1FcbtMHYyf4/WyHj33ZcnYKFn/W1Hl0zmc7PCwxdW2nxU9D Cp7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.126.1 with SMTP id mu1mr11296597igb.93.1439215849753; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 07:10:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150809131504 DOT 4d5ad4f8 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20150810122457 DOT GA19015 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA on FreeBSD From: "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b1637b77ad29a051cf58d2d Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b1637b77ad29a051cf58d2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Good old days... :-) single Unix operating system. My dream. I think we struggle too much with all these Unix variants. Lev On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:02 PM, wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 01:15:04PM +0200, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) >> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> I recently compiled geda on my FreeBSD box, and I am happy to say, that >>> it compiles out of the box. >>> >>> Many thanks to commit the patches. >>> >>> One note to add, that gmake is required. >>> >>> Making all in data >>> make[3]: don't know how to make libgeda.xml. Stop >>> >> Hi, Lev, >> >> Please look at the latest patch at >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1473456 >> Will it work for you? >> >> I had not enough time to look into it. (Does *BSD make support $<, and, >> if yes, why the author uses $@.in instead? and so on...) >> > > FYI, I have a project called v7us, which ports system V7 (UNIX of the late > 70s) make to Linux. V7 happened before the UNIX wars, around the time BSD > started to exist. > > In practice this means if a Makefile is good to go with v7make, it will > work with BSD variants, proprietary UNIX variants and GNU make. If you are > interested in using v7make for testing, please let me know and I support > you with the installation process. > > I've also put the manual online for reference: > http://igor2.repo.hu/tmp/v7make.1 - it seems you have $@, $*, $< and $?, > but you don't have $^ for example. > > > Regards, > > Igor2 > --047d7b1637b77ad29a051cf58d2d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good old days... :-) single Unix operating syste= m. My dream.

I think we struggle too much with all these Unix = variants.

Lev

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:02 PM, <= gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT h= u> wrote:
=

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 01:15:04PM +0200, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] w= rote:
Hi all,


I recently compiled geda on my FreeBSD box, and I am happy to say, that
it compiles out of the box.

Many thanks to commit the patches.

One note to add, that gmake is required.

Making all in data
make[3]: don't know how to make libgeda.xml. Stop
Hi, Lev,

Please look at the latest patch at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1473456
Will it work for you?

I had not enough time to look into it. (Does *BSD make support $<, and,<= br> if yes, why the author uses $@.in instead? and so on...)

FYI, I have a project called v7us, which ports system V7 (UNIX of the late = 70s) make to Linux. V7 happened before the UNIX wars, around the time BSD s= tarted to exist.

In practice this means if a Makefile is good to go with v7make, it will wor= k with BSD variants, proprietary UNIX variants and GNU make. If you are int= erested in using v7make for testing, please let me know and I support you w= ith the installation process.

I've also put the manual online for reference: http://igor2.rep= o.hu/tmp/v7make.1 - it seems you have $@, $*, $< and $?, but you don= 't have $^ for example.


Regards,

Igor2

--047d7b1637b77ad29a051cf58d2d--