X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:49:47 +0100 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Footprint Generator Message-ID: <20150127194947.GA12913@visitor2.iram.es> References: <77F8B90A-C943-46E3-AC87-709FB59B0681 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150127145943 DOT GA29939 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: iram.es] -0.5 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0109] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Edward, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:29:05AM -0800, Edward Hennessy wrote: > Gabriel, > > Thank you for the info. You're welcome. > > > On Jan 27, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > > > I was also on a frequencly updated Debian testing machine. On another > > machine I had Debian stable but ruby-gtk3 is not available, so it's > > hopeless. > > There is an alternate way to retrieve Ruby gems that I need to look into. Both gem and bundler can obtain and install gems. > > > The version of gio2 is 2.2.0-5+b2 in Debian numbering. > > > > However the changes between 2.1 and 2.2 from the git repository for > > ruby-gio2 are extremely large, so it's not surprising. Most of > > the C code has disappeared and many bindings seem to be automatically > > generated through black magic, I mean gobject-introspection. > > I've checked in a potential fix to the repository. The fix abandons using Gio in favor of Ruby core library. > Good idea, I think that the Ruby core is less likely to suffer incompatible changes. > > Besides that, I think that this package generator is a very good initiative, > > but I'd suggest to add a BGA generation option. > > I've added BGA packages to the issue list as an enhancement. > Thanks. Gabriel