X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:27:16 +0100
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] HIDDEN PINS IN A SYMBOL
Message-ID: <20150119112716.GB17436@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <CALSZ9gp08b7L5HMesdT3yX-di-0PsqqjRA0b0RKGbc4FtOm6rQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20150117213351 DOT 106EE81A5EB7 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
 <CAOFvGD5+=KfJ=6m+96ASmDe9QZ1DeSiJoQAWXbBGww0H+3z85g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAOxVtSS9FVpgh1eYdj4tSr8LVkdp0=H8VVgxVAM=tYCqaAQY5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20150117222659 DOT 0CE0581A5EB7 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
 <CAM2RGhRapmzSh+g_ELuXnaQk-EwbmFwZQriV_Z_WEOE36Vm8Vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhRapmzSh+g_ELuXnaQk-EwbmFwZQriV_Z_WEOE36Vm8Vw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details:   (-0.2 points)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
  0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                             [score: 0.5101]
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:43AM -0500, Evan Foss wrote:
> I know it looks ugly but I always show all the pins. I feel it better
> reflects what the situation is more honestly.

It takes a lot of schematics real-estate, I typically use only a simple
diode and rename the pins in the package. I did this for a ZHCS2000, I
don't see any problem since PCB complains as long as it finds a single
non-connected pin, i.e, it wants all "1" and "2" pins to be connected.

    Regards,
    Gabriel