X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=L+bQBPxfx3Tf+QuvCdH/qUSz6LIVevV5TeErWpO52j0=; b=FXLKwO4jSCFtMaG5g2p8udQdvmIQfrQ7gWlo66VZTa6pJEkbv5liVvfvou1OI4bN1Y 7gLr4HqAX8jv5o9XTv8jZUMBZQJjR7ukH2jmISvrp+jwkBhrOViwLV8vtp2KrnFNQz6n EZGV13NO+6RBGAs0IhbfUOJFZ+McE8OLMl02g7dbL/xVVyxoSqHsjcpFtlHB6yH1MRWw NvyCmeu7ouMU6ATchRezrhoUgJBCf2Tl4rzjZ6bCRfVaCcbdVa7OoZqfXWFGL5z4hYhY VWxVX+EJB+xBDlaU8ZrbTdgM5/f6E63STFmZ+kBrl+rgrhdunM4HItoMTWSGRKPmj6x3 DdsA== X-Received: by 10.152.120.37 with SMTP id kz5mr25240137lab.21.1380032852025; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:27:25 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem and gtk version Message-ID: <20130924142724.GA27531@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <87siwv1jt1 DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> <87y56m25cm DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y56m25cm.fsf@harrington.peter-b.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:47:37AM +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote: > Peter TB Brett writes: > > > Generally we try and run about 2 years behind our dependencies, so 1.9.1 > > will probably have an increment of required GTK+ version. 2.24.0 would > > *probably* be the next version required (released 2013-01-30). > > Oops. I mean, released on 2011-01-30, obviously...! Anyway, despite of the fact that gtk 2.24 is marked obsolete on the Gnome development site, I still can build geda-gaf with 2.20 using Sergey's patch (and that's fine!). For testers, it would be nice to have apparently noticed versions of libraries, required for the next release, rather than look around what's going wrong.