X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb) Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:22:11 +0200 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <5236BA86 DOT 2070306 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309160814 DOT r8G8EONW004255 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-171-176.net-htp.de User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I can see the use of editing the pin and pad names, but what is the >> use of editing the via and line names? > > So when you're creating a footprint you can give pins and pads names > before you merge them into the footprint. Ack. I make use of this in my work-flow for footpint generation. Along the same lines I miss the ability to attach names to rectangles. Since a few versions of pcb pads also turn into pads on conversion to a footprint. They are much more intuitive than pads derived from lines. - ---<)kaimartin(>--- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlI91cMACgkQt9RkiGwLn1N5JACgrQ+8k3ll0SGYsdF5WzPxX4mI JAIAnRz3sFJ+MKrZ6T2Wi9d+uSVGZom0 =9qkT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----