X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MZ2pB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=608a3bcf a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=1yK/BHxyC4ZmIdxpzi4zFw==:17 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=3YhXtTcJ-WEA:10 a=2oAn-hFjyh9eOH-F14kA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=epilitimus.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=q4Q4v1R317cmrLVa3F5x5sJ4QBo2w2xGDmwMVbv+JOU=; b=GiVOWzO9PrcqtpIMJi3+vUoBu8 b7dIoH2aacKJ+Ozcn76cxr3gdGL7c1s7ve0a25jrzOhWm1kA1XTv/CaqI1tH8rHK7ZCFq1wx2jxTJ YwYeDyS6rarlBqcReSGF/Dq83e7rVJpUSiJ1oYZCQ2KTKfu5aNIcRpDgy0Y4+iI+u17vhAbUF+AAM p1MjCg/sEty/CRqRE82ks351+9nkvW4y2iZjbXzGrEKeGPmfSNImHiJ7Rb+nWu395jBtM64QA9P5n bdKYYGQPwkLZM/muK7EDwycRG8K/s4SlkrZUTepBBN5PnpG8rLFTQAFgO66f2sb1XhCCvi9UWQQpz /htJPS8Q==; Subject: Re: [geda-user] xspice integration To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <9fe0dd9a-cbb8-a51f-f63d-36cd6d3a31c7 AT epilitimus DOT com> <4775a561-41ad-5368-271a-998ded5bfbc6 AT epilitimus DOT com> <07d13043-cd66-88f1-4b6c-172345c864e1 AT epilitimus DOT com> <1425fd69-5796-6cde-198b-8218f71e187d AT epilitimus DOT com> From: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <9d55627f-942e-f4f5-aeea-c4754381e72e@epilitimus.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:53:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfN0LsZXDJZ84HHMMWv2wGiMkPfeLPcrqiH4dWa0GHQSK9VwCcRaGQNrFRHYkLlAdfhUNnp1MJw9xQECrh+j19FXMjGUrXCV9h64MZQ+R4oOJUD5cKCB/ 6oqP01f/W7P6filKnYX7lGlTyh/Jx9VAx5tSzTzJssQ4hYMh/pwcCiJoyscVuu8GHGrAa2L61T/ZgbLHkuhVlabCNtRi74Xsi9z5TmbTHzuR0MsEgobAc/BK Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Roland, 1. Do you have any objections to the symbol hierarchy being more than one level deep. Specifically there are both control (e.g. xspice_processor-1.sym) and functional (e.g. xspice_adb-1.sym) xspice specific devices. My preference is to put them in a directory structure like: symbols/xspice/control symbols/xspice/functional But I don't see anywhere else in the symbol hierarchy that is more than one level below the top level. I think a multiple level structure would make them easier to find. What is your preference? 2. There are multiple groups of symbols, Some are xspice specific (e.g. xspice_dab-1.sym), others are not (e.g. nfet-1.sym [geda currently doesn't provide a jfet symbol so I drew one]). Do you prefer all the symbols placed as one commit, one group per commit, one symbol per commit? Keeping in mind different symbols go to different directories. Glenn