X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:50:26 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Luis de Arquer (ldearquer AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: DRC clearance bugs [PATCH 1/2]
In-Reply-To: <CAGqyy=aozyALZuCysebmNea4=2+FVOcSdEs2hnaJ=kusGFQRSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1807151046480.8169@igor2priv>
References: <CAGqyy=aozyALZuCysebmNea4=2+FVOcSdEs2hnaJ=kusGFQRSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Luis de Arquer (ldearquer AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
> It can be applied to current master

Unfortunately these don't apply on pcb-rnd sources (obviously).

Besides the dual-bbox thing I wrote earlier, I like your patch, you are 
welcome to do similar in pcb-rnd. Our data model differs, has less 
restrictions, so I believe more cases need to be handled:

- line vs poly (present in mainline too)

- arc vs poly (present in mainline too)

- padstack vs poly (in mainline this is via vs. poly, pin vs. poly and pad 
vs. poly)

- poly vs poly (because pcb-rnd supports poly-poly clearances as well, so 
you can easily desing those cool PSU boards with real thick copper 
everywhere)

Regards,

Igor2