X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:09:21 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it?
 the EDA ecosystem) + help needed
In-Reply-To: <20170216183850.GB14699@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702170406150.7286@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702161842490 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:47:54PM +0100, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, I see you're reimplementing json and such...
>>
>> Which point made you think that?
>
> Similarity ;-)
>
>> Facts:
>>
>> - the whole parser impelemntaion is about 60 lines of C code (I can't
>> believe JSON and such goes that low)
>>
>> - 0 external dependencies
>>
>> - not language specific - many languages don't have easily accessible
>> json/xml/whatever parsers but can read lines of text
>>
>> - you sure noticed it's not a tree, but a flat thing
>
> Well, any limited implementation is less than a more complex one.
>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I would prefer to have a parser for verilog or vhdl
>>> available for all our programs as a library.
>>
>> Well, MYSP (Make Your Specific Proposal) and we'll see if it gains
>> acceptance. Even better if you also include your implementation with the
>> proposal.
>
> s-expressions ;-)
>
> Kicad already uses them, and you already use Erich's parser to
> work with them, IIUC.
>
> Scheme just 'read()'s them.
>
> Please consider applying of <irony></irony> tags to my proposals
> if you think I just troll you :-) I don't want to mean any offence
> or trolling, honestly.

Fine, thanks.

Unfortunately I couldn't decode whether you will or will not join the 
actual tEDAx implementation effort from the lepton side.

A simple "yes" or "no" is sufficient.