X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 18:46:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To: "Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: gEDA/gaf: want an advice
In-Reply-To: <1af8aee7-f6c5-89f5-2298-b89788084ab3@peter-b.co.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702091827340.2487@nimbus>
References: <1af8aee7-f6c5-89f5-2298-b89788084ab3 AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi Peter,

it's nice to hear from you again.

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I've joined in working on this branch [1], because I did several years 
> of work on getting gEDA into a decent state and I'm pleased to see 
> someone building on it.
>
> I've added several performance improvements in libgeda, and fixed a 
> whole load of stability bugs in gschem.

What are your reasons for committing your patches to Vladimir's branch?
Is there something you don't consider `decent' about the main repository?

> If you like using geda 1.8.2 and you want something that's fully 
> backward-compatible and stable

As is the code I refactored.  If you know of anything incompatible or 
unstable which I'm not aware of, please let me know so I can fix it.

Roland