X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RGDljcQXTvFWvJNUYQbFkNJ4c+VEe409ns1D0nKtkBQ=; b=woHR7h81w1ujNk2uCkD1tIoAjkzWOrhWlZFlriaV2WIQRFBGjInC9eRnv5DJ+nrqCA Lfl7FvqqSDPeTlxn9v4MWJXQe3x8Eu0Qe6YE94nIn/DnO4fRjQ0MfrRUmwKikIqdP+fU kw71vxs4OxbQJSZb+vfgK3NNHRL+ZQNEGSnTsSrQmJoG+2YggSMbri73dddVpY/8845Q j8qUi/UCN1BeK0jAYe8vpcF+TZbZwmcCpDohdA+m/OaSKsVnWebDqCgukC+ECtj1GKm3 /uQJRB4YuBk6p7+tnJQZQstxFOhpYkUMuAZotSRRLl3KK4j23oQSUYA7Mhzhp1dsIAuK HT6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RGDljcQXTvFWvJNUYQbFkNJ4c+VEe409ns1D0nKtkBQ=; b=mqR+xFV914yxFgM4RBqsnTR5Zt3vRF8n5ky/qQXkF7Em1OTnf/NhQdyOO9qsQpSF3O pTuHtC2WqdTgFVoCzg1JIoXFVfpNQEAB/6npr7GrZr5VL7DQRAObdv3dzLRRzOuHzBkl bcCB4Hbk8Qk+6TO1Np+9872ckFS2H8GzcJ4g3xW4dV68s/qNyl3l07xXsi3QGusu6I01 n3NkwMJh7/OS1tR7mCo+GPdhFK6TqMLz3zsabBhkaNo0FqzL+nSWFXinJE5uH2vj8EpA hKFuzVq4w2QiPNdzjqY/bqxd+WmGfIztectAP0qdTay5O/KhcoAdOqEryBzCvUGbJm8n 4BMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS2CzlDXq3Sdu7I0AGZd6JaGkPn+8VOkb9or1XGZl7G3Iu2b24tdi4HhTCWHb+o3fBBWd4/XVvGPx42iA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.233.131 with SMTP id tw3mr6504187oec.35.1455799042266; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:37:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602171704.u1HH4M4P017122@envy.delorie.com> References: <56C43FA3 DOT 4090904 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201602171704 DOT u1HH4M4P017122 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:37:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] settings file for pcb? From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1a31cc773a8052c0aa07d Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c1a31cc773a8052c0aa07d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 For me, it is reading 1px as 0.1mil. px hacks seem like a bad idea to me.. (IE.. should have no conversion to actual length dimensions, except in the context of the render code). This is probably more a "type safety" kind of issue, than a hard bug. I'm not up to git HEAD yet with my branches (haven't rebased past the layer changes yet), but I don't recall seeing anything in the log which was relevant to this. Peter On 17 February 2016 at 17:04, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Hmm - what has pixels got to do with anything... BUG? (it gets read in as > > 0.1mil .actually, but emitting px is wrong) > > Might be a version mismatch; px is used for rat lines and other > graphical decorations that need zoom-independent sizes. It's a hack > that maps 1 px -> 1 nm up to 20 px or so. > > So 1 px should be read as 1 nm. > --001a11c1a31cc773a8052c0aa07d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For me, it is reading 1px as 0.1mil.

px hacks seem like a bad idea to me.. (IE.. should have no conversio= n to actual length dimensions, except in the context of the render code). T= his is probably more a "type safety" kind of issue, than a hard b= ug.

I'm not up to git HEAD yet with my branches= (haven't rebased past the layer changes yet), but I don't recall s= eeing anything in the log which was relevant to this.


Pete= r

On 17 Febr= uary 2016 at 17:04, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Hmm - what has pixels got to do with anything... BUG? (it gets read in= as
> 0.1mil .actually, but emitting px is wrong)

Might be a version mismatch; px is used for rat lines and other
graphical decorations that need zoom-independent sizes.=C2=A0 It's a ha= ck
that maps 1 px -> 1 nm up to 20 px or so.

So 1 px should be read as 1 nm.

--001a11c1a31cc773a8052c0aa07d--