X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z2UCOdnMa8gS9WvCA8emIcnp+79jdgEF2VfqYp1HlVQ=; b=W7OhVXBFZRbnWHBgw5Nyq3zfEneEo5U3Js+w19im3YCEGAL+NXwdboca54xg6zQ6Ar NlAPjvaTKaYSxpFW+PkFYijC7dYhnATvYJf4gKIfcqYmjXjj7HHxyWl+5ewtMDsHL+Om Vc/Y2BDzMannZh6TQ17oJvCLW39edgXeUbX6Bt6GbcTIFWczaosN7pATem8uytxz9snH UGLJau9Vi3u2yUTl0R+zAdlq+CbK1cDCp5jA9jz8C3CpFxAUH6weHcIPzVZcJ6yj3idF 70zkG+ZibNBumZEOVPtnSIyoSdRswByKuuh/3OZe4u3yHK6SxrbIPNs1Fd8Mu1uUwGEC crew== X-Received: by 10.25.26.210 with SMTP id a201mr20844830lfa.57.1452414823717; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:33:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:33:42 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] (draw on insulating layers) Message-Id: <20160110093342.4921169f9b26a07abe28139c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20160106164022 DOT D0D4E809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106180912 DOT 42ddf4079d91384f206b7c35 AT gmail DOT com> <20160106191433 DOT 5dc5cb59 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106202817 DOT 56197b2c539d426a1b724c9e AT gmail DOT com> <568E09ED DOT 1080508 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <568E6354 DOT 80302 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <20160108002640 DOT 03233b24 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160108175259 DOT 127a3f073616758434f7edff AT gmail DOT com> <20160109020345 DOT 1e07cb84 AT jive> <882E12BE-93AD-4A43-B87A-65F05269D6B4 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160109193526 DOT 9f998ebeec0141b637ff5751 AT gmail DOT com> <8A0C79D4-975F-4CD8-8227-2CB050304412 AT noqsi DOT com> <201601092000 DOT u09K0HT9009084 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201601092139 DOT u09LdAGQ013146 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u0A8Xo4F032287 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:27:46 +0100 geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan Böttcher) wrote: > DJ Delorie writes: > > >> Inventing your own private meanings for common words is not a good > >> path to comprehension. > > > > I didn't invent them. > > > > And they're pretty common in industry. (example: photoshop layers > > aren't always "material" and Eagle has more layers than just the > > physical ones) > > The Gerber spec that you can find following links from the gerbv page > replaced the word "layer" with "levels" when talking about stacking > polarity. Basically, whenever you switch from positive to negative > polarity or back, a new "level" is entered implicitly. > > Stephan I would say even if gerber have proble handling negative polarity workaround is done today for copper layers and work so it would make sense with cut out in pcb/gpcb. I think a cut outs width height would make sense for footprint court yard it would "say" space is needed and if placed on internal layer it would cut thru material above it. I also discovered Acamco realeased a new gerber specification first of January this year. Nicklas Karlsson