X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=) To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] (draw on insulating layers) References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20160106143629 DOT 4D39D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106164022 DOT D0D4E809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106180912 DOT 42ddf4079d91384f206b7c35 AT gmail DOT com> <20160106191433 DOT 5dc5cb59 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106202817 DOT 56197b2c539d426a1b724c9e AT gmail DOT com> <568E09ED DOT 1080508 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <568E6354 DOT 80302 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <20160108002640 DOT 03233b24 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160108175259 DOT 127a3f073616758434f7edff AT gmail DOT com> <20160109020345 DOT 1e07cb84 AT jive> <882E12BE-93AD-4A43-B87A-65F05269D6B4 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160109193526 DOT 9f998ebeec0141b637ff5751 AT gmail DOT com> <8A0C79D4-975F-4CD8-8227-2CB050304412 AT noqsi DOT com> <201601092000 DOT u09K0HT9009084 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201601092139 DOT u09LdAGQ013146 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:27:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201601092139.u09LdAGQ013146@envy.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's message of "Sat, 9 Jan 2016 16:39:10 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk DJ Delorie writes: >> Inventing your own private meanings for common words is not a good >> path to comprehension. > > I didn't invent them. > > And they're pretty common in industry. (example: photoshop layers > aren't always "material" and Eagle has more layers than just the > physical ones) The Gerber spec that you can find following links from the gerbv page replaced the word "layer" with "levels" when talking about stacking polarity. Basically, whenever you switch from positive to negative polarity or back, a new "level" is entered implicitly. -- Stephan