X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=K5I40mM3xkQGyqtUlq4rj1n8RNQcSWYAqiLjxoqqiMk=; b=m5MlcJxL1HPK2N9tAA+gJb57pvSxbmcbVGtWCAaqXo5lFuTAPt0YcJykn35n5u9i/y CCG/Y2LnqGe+ZU1jpHYNoutiYWnSM4LG7uy2LwDYksai5PPwhqcBOR6NR9Rl3Z4P2ZI6 NlVVKWi9/WFNE0OaO5Z9E8TTyLjbzKvfbSJynClW97IBB0YvOlBWNB7cZlsVDlFrcJAU jX/1GHwnJ8Akedu+REjrIvmlI+T0OWTre/MOZAgjrw/sEy7r4oE3yMvN3T1I5qEPn8vq kk03XngTq/4sKWDhlMMa/R0sqqb3R7y4XptwRF5iyjUIW4HnEh9tFIkrolbS+a4gvFss fy4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.201.77 with SMTP id z74mr84513349oif.24.1452363118722; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 10:11:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201601091746.u09HkM6E014413@envy.delorie.com> References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20160106091006 DOT 5F67B809D7A1 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106133049 DOT 5A0E9809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106143629 DOT 4D39D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106164022 DOT D0D4E809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160106180912 DOT 42ddf4079d91384f206b7c35 AT gmail DOT com> <20160106191433 DOT 5dc5cb59 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160106202817 DOT 56197b2c539d426a1b724c9e AT gmail DOT com> <568E09ED DOT 1080508 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <568E6354 DOT 80302 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <20160108002640 DOT 03233b24 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20160108175259 DOT 127a3f073616758434f7edff AT gmail DOT com> <20160109020345 DOT 1e07cb84 AT jive> <20160109182213 DOT a55836cd56a507d0833b48d6 AT gmail DOT com> <201601091746 DOT u09HkM6E014413 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:11:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] (draw on insulating layers) From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f920c6c6580528eaa3a5 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a1134f920c6c6580528eaa3a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 9 January 2016 at 17:46, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Sometimes it is neccessary to draw a bord cutout and I guess a > > filled rectangle with cutouts would make the most sense? Or? > > We have an outline layer for that, but really, you can use any drawing > layer for cutouts if you tell the fab house "this gerber is for > cutouts". > Unfortunately, this is simply inadequate for unambiguous, machine-usable data. I need to add explicit shape modelling. Every board manufacturing standard that came after gerber needs better physical data than this approach can provide. Peter --001a1134f920c6c6580528eaa3a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 9= January 2016 at 17:46, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
> Sometimes it is neccessary to draw a bord cutout and I guess a
> filled rectangle with cutouts would make the most sense? Or?

We have an outline layer for that, but really, you can use any drawi= ng
layer for cutouts if you tell the fab house "this gerber is for
cutouts".

Unfortunately, this= is simply inadequate for unambiguous, machine-usable data. I need to add e= xplicit shape modelling.

Every boar= d manufacturing standard that came after gerber needs better physical data = than this approach can provide.

Peter=C2=A0
--001a1134f920c6c6580528eaa3a5--